Why a Good Person Can Vote Against Same-sex Marriage

Posted by:

by Sarah Kerns

I was reading an article written by Dennis Prager with an article entitled, “Why a good person can vote against same-sex marriage.” Before you completely disregard this, read it. He goes into the flaws on both arguments, but ultimately shows why he feels the way he does. It’s very enlightening.

Proponents of same-sex marriage ask: Is keeping the definition of marriage as man-woman fair to gays? Opponents of same-sex marriage ask: Is same-sex marriage good for society?

Few on either side honestly address the question of the other side. Opponents of same-sex marriage rarely acknowledge how unfair the age-old man-woman definition is to gay couples. And proponents rarely, if ever, acknowledge that this unprecedented redefinition of marriage may not be good for society.

He goes on to explain that the argument that being against same-sex marriage is racist, is completely wrong.

First, this charge is predicated on the profoundly false premise that race and sex (or “gender” as it is now referred to) are analogous.

They are not.

While there are no differences between black and white human beings, there are enormous differences between male and female human beings. That is why sports events, clothing, public restrooms, and (often) schools are routinely divided by sex. But black sporting events and white sporting events, black restrooms and white restrooms, black schools and white schools, or black clothing stores and white clothing stores would be considered immoral.

Because racial differences are insignificant and gender differences are hugely significant, there is no moral equivalence between opposition to interracial marriage and opposition to same-sex marriage.

He goes on to talk about what’s “fair”

Is the man-woman definition of marriage fair to gays who wish to marry? No, it isn’t. And those of us opposed to same-sex marriage need to be honest about this, to confront the human price paid by some people through no fault of their own and figure out ways to offer gay couples basic rights associated with marriage.

But whether a policy is fair to every individual can never be the only question society asks in establishing social policy. Eyesight standards for pilots are unfair to some terrifically capable individuals. Orchestra standards are unfair to many talented musicians. A mandatory retirement age is unfair to many people. Wherever there are standards, there will be unfairness to individuals.

I would encourage you to read the article because then he goes into more detail about how changing the definition of marriage impacts everyone and even if it’s giving rights to some, it’s just the same taking rights away to many.

(http://www.dennisprager.com/why-a-good-person-can-vote-against-same-sex-marriage/)

 

0

About the Author: